The Power of Toga

Toga

We, as a race, seem to have an affinity for clothing trends that goes way beyond what type of jeans are fashionable, and what are not.

Here’s an interesting observation, just for the sake of conversation:

If Buddha were to arrive today, wearing a blue suit and a tie, would he be noticed?

If Mohammad were to speak at your local city hall, wearing khakis and a white dress shirt, would you listen?

If Jesus Christ were to appear right in front of you, at the altar of your church, wearing a pair of blue jeans and a t-shirt, would you wait long enough to hear his words, before asking him to move aside?

Answer to all of the above:

No.

No.

No.

This observation does not include the fact, that you would probably require Jesus Christ to speak in Old English, and appear with long, brown hair, looking much like an Italian from the Renaissance period of history.

When faced with this type of conjecture, the followers of Jesus Christ often respond with:

I know it will be Him.  Everyone will know.

Personally, I’m not too sure of that.  No one has ever painted a true depiction of him.  But, on the other hand, anything is possible.

One thing I do know for sure.  If all three of these esteemed archetypes of our history showed up in togas, they  would certainly get noticed.  And, after a few moments of being noticed, or a few hours, the local police would probably question them, and take them to the local authorities for questioning.

Then, they would be gone, and humanity would happily return to  its wandering, and wondering.  And, once again, continue to move in circles

Up to this point, many of you are probably nodding, and thinking that you’ve heard this before.  And, that is true.  Many have pointed this out.  But, there’s more to this problem than all of us may be aware of.

Because of our need for togas, which place these Masters in a certain time frame of fashion, we also have a need for non-change.  Or, reversion to the old way of thinking. Never moving beyond ancient thoughts, ideals or revelation.

Here are some important questions to consider on your search for toga-clad gurus:

Why didn’t these Masters have the knowledge of other planetary existence?  And, if they did, why was it edited out of their transcripts?

Why did these Masters not address child abuse, domestic violence and racism?  Did they approve of the division of between skin color, or turn their faces away from battered children?

When I spoke to a local minister about the issue of child abuse, and its lack of commentary in holy texts, he simply stated that no children were abused in these times.

I find that hard to believe.

These Masters also seem to disregard the equality of women in their lectures.  And, the issue of slavery.

Were they in approval of such?

In some of the ancient texts, there was slight comment in the smallest way, of these topics.  But, if we have truly evolved since those times, it would appear to me that these issues were severely rampant during their lifetime, and they would have mentioned the need for change.

Why wasn’t it addressed?

These togas, that are required by humanity, also represent a much more disturbing truth.  It appears that there is still a need to return to the old days.

Look again at your history books.  Look at what the old days entailed.

Is that really what you want?

These Masters that you cherish.  Their words.  Their clothing styles.

They all represent something that humanity may have not realized, as of yet.

Inertia…

21 Responses to “The Power of Toga”

  1. Zing—–>. Right to the heart of the matter. I love it. :-)

  2. Musing. Again. Thanks, Louis..

  3. Rosemary Says:

    It makes me wonder did any of them ever really wear togas and if they did, didn’t everyone else during the time frame in which they lived? Somehow, It seems to me to be a “marketing” tool to sell an image and concept created after the individual was no longer around to speak for themselves.
    During their lives, I can only imagine that they were much like any other individual living at the time but were unique due to their seeking, searching and attaining spiritual truth. How much of the noteriety of the individual came after their death, many long years afterward, so who really knew what they looked like, what they wore and of what they truly spoke.
    They probably did speak out against child abuse, racism and equality for women but that got lost in “translation” or omitted because those creating the stories didn’t find it useful for their purpose. It may also be that only their closest friends knew the depth of their wisdom on various subjects like this since their words may have fallen on deaf ears. Much of humanity has not seemed to be interested in “hearing” the truth, they listen but do not hear. Change takes too much effort for some so they don”t even try which may be why so many look to the past, to the old ways, to stereotypes instead of looking for a new fresh approach full of truth and free of misconceptions and misrepresentations.
    It is articles like this that make me examine things on a deeper level, thank you for your writings. They always make me think!

  4. And, keep thinking. All Masters are given revelations according to their current times. When times change, and they are long gone, we should be open to new Masters, and their current revelations. Always progressing, always moving forward.

    Thanks, Rosemary

  5. Once I took it all in that the Bible was completely self-serving to the interests of men with women being given lesser rank, I was virtually through with it. I do believe some of the statements attributed to Jesus were real but probably anything that didn’t suit the author’s needs was excluded. I’ve been on my own as an “independent” Christian for many years and it suits me fine. I am free to investigate all sorts of subjects and ideas.

    Regarding evolving, I don’t think we have yet. As a whole, the human race has isn’t much further along than in Jesus’ time. We need a big shake-up before we’ll ever move forward and that thought isn’t pleasant. Unfortunately and ironically, those who aspire to be among the who’s who of their religions are the ones holding us all back. I tell you something that never ceases to amaze me and that is the number of women who actively support their own subjugation. Unbelievable.

  6. I tell you something that never ceases to amaze me and that is the number of women who actively support their own subjugation. Unbelievable.

    Is it unbelievable?

    Truly?

    After working for ministries for nearly 30 years, before I left, I was privy to hundreds of vows taken by new Christians. Each time, that vow included agreement that all other religions were, in so many words, condemned to Hell, if they did not agree with Christianity.

    In the light of that, can you call yourself an independent Christian? Seems like an oxymoron, to me.

    You either agree with the above vow, and can, by their standards, call yourself a Christian.

    Or, you don’t. And, you can not, according to the above, call yourself a Christian.

    Just a thought.

  7. More:

    It’s rather like joining a club that agrees that quilt making is the only hobby worth indulging in.

    You agree with that tenet, and join that club. Because that’s what that club believes.

    It would be deceitful of you to join that club, and not agree with their credo.

    Would it not?

  8. Yes, it amazes me completely when I see women willingly continue their subservient role within marriage and personal relationships with men based upon Bible verse. As the young sister to two older brothers and an abusive father, as well as being married for seven years to a total jerk – I understand quite well the mentality of men. So, I’m a feminist in that I believe I’m equal to any man. If anything, biologically and emotionally, I’m believe I’m superior to men in that I don’t have testosterone coursing through my veins clouding my mind with agression and dominance issues. No offense to anyone – these are my personal beliefs and observations.

    I have little faith in the judgment of the men who chronicled Jesus’ life as they are the ones who deserted him while significantly, Mary stayed with him to the end. My faith in Jesus Christ transcends the writings of some ignorant old geezers 2000 years ago. They didn’t get him at all, did they? Jesus spends most of his time explaining over and over the same concept. So I believe in His concept or message which I conveniently extract from Bible verse. I believe he communicates with me – always for my higher good.

    As for “the club” that is the church, I think that Jesus was pretty fed up with the foolishness of humans and was glad to get out of here as his work was done. Do you think he would have joined that church that denied him? I’m not interested in that church.

    I see no incongruity in my stance as an independent Christian unless I apply the mentality and logic of the 2000 year old Bible which is one scary story – have you read Leviticus lately? Is anyone living out Leviticus these days? (maybe some are) If not, are they being deceitful? No, everybody picks and chooses what rings true for them, hence, so many denominations. I don’t think I’m being deceitful. Maybe I should just describe myself as a follower of Jesus. I have no desire to join any organized religion.

  9. Maybe I should just describe myself as a follower of Jesus.

    Ah, that’s a better description. I agree.

    Ever wonder who Jesus followed? We are told that we should try to be more like him, correct?

    Well, we should also follow the same “one” that he followed. Logical?

  10. By the way, as I recall, somewhere in the late 1970’s my church posted huge banners.

    It was news. News to all of us.

    “Jesus is God”

    That was a big day in our church, and for the entire congregation.

    Now, the predominant amount of Christians I speak with, say that Jesus is, indeed, God.

    They’re all younger than me, too. And somehow they’ve been told that Jesus was always God. So, we do go on a bit, while I show my age.

    But, it’s true. According to my church, and that era, Jesus didn’t officially become God, until the late 1970’s.

    And, that day, I remember very well…

    Just some interesting info.

  11. To which does one ascribe… Faith or Belief? The more attraction a leader gains the more followers may amass. Sure the external array one adorns is a contrived approach as well as manipulative diatribes that collect response in favor of those who can find solace.

    Faith can be shared as a momentum gatherer however it can be pulled apart if it fails to keep current while Belief is a time tested truth that never yields to the distractions and vices that invade ones sense of security.

    What’s the difference between testosterone or estrogen other than reactionary communication that modifies at its own level?

    Regardless of “any” appearance the ones that will “see” those who bring messages to the masses have found the truth of compassion and belief will endorse the eventual.

  12. To which does one ascribe… Faith or Belief?

    Joseph,

    As a mystic, I would say neither, if they are exclusive.

    I ascribe my faith, to facts. And, if they cannot be proven to me, I will justify use of “belief” until they are.

    But, I cannot ascribe my faith to belief. Belief is a passing fancy.

    Knowledge is concrete. What you know to be true. Stories are good, and inspiring. But should only be used to enhance the validity of your own experiences.

    That’s how I see it, for what it’s worth.

  13. Granting exclusivity rights is a wonderful way to segment that in which one seeks to “prevail”. If it were to make a change that is difficult to adapt or adjust would faith waver or mysticism override logic?

    I’m finding it quite interesting studying mysticism and must make it a point to read more about it from the source that obviously has it together!

    Have a wonderful weekend and Happy Father’s Day!!!

  14. Joseph said “What’s the difference between testosterone or estrogen other than reactionary communication that modifies at its own level?” Gosh, I wish men would modify some of their actions. Unfortunately, that’s the last thing that many seem inclined to do. Testosterone potentiates itself in susceptible males – that’s what makes some men dangerous characters.

    Now what makes some women dangerous characters? Men! LOL!

  15. You have made a great point as usual Teresa!

    We are taught to accept God from an early age and this acceptance is expected to be blind yet when faced with any other non quantifiable mystery, we tend to reject it immediately.

    Namaste,

    Roger

  16. The means by which we are taught, need to be re-examined.

  17. Heather Says:

    T,

    I’ve long believed that if Jesus returned in this age of virtual reality and special effects, we simply wouldn’t believe it was him. “No … really,” he’d say, pointing to himself; “It’s ME! Kid-you-not!” And we’d all go about our business, muttering something unkind about the homeless problem and crazy men with Christ complexes.

    And when you look at it … very deeply … and come to believe that the King James version is just that — *his* version — it can really knock the wind out of you. Liberating? Absolutely! But also a little scary.

    What moves me — rather, what motivates me to keep moving and searching past my comfort zone — are my children. I want my daughter and son both to understand that they don’t have to play out the roles they’ve been “assigned” by organized religion. They are free to live larger, should they so desire.

    Years ago when I moved to the deep south, I was flummoxed by the first question of every new acquaintance: “What church do you go to?” Always asked politely and with a smile, but pointedly, too. I used to squirm around, until one day, I landed on this response: “What an interesting question! Why do you ask?”

    *Crickets* :-)

    I wonder why so many people think you can’t live an honorable, spiritual life without showing up on Sunday?

  18. Heather,

    I think the bigger question is why do we squirm when asked? I don’t. I say that I don’t attend any church. The question never goes beyond that, and we both go on our merry way.

    But, twenty years ago, it might have been different. Or maybe not. I don’t remember being asked.

    Times have changed. Plus, there is freedom of religion in this country. There is also freedom of no religion in this country.

    State your case and stand your ground. The law is protecting your decision.

  19. Heather: I laughed out loud at your cricket extended-pause insertion. How creative! I’m going to plagiarize it – if you don’t mind!

  20. Heather Says:

    Beth: Absolutely use at will! I can’t take credit for it. My friend Sandie used to say it all the time. It always makes me think of that old Looney Tunes cartoon where Bugs and Daffy compete against one another on stage. Daffy tap dances his heart out, slobbering and sweating. He ends with a flourish to the sound of … crickets. :-)

    Be well!

Leave a Reply